Appellate Court Summary

Appellate philander SummaryTable of ContentsTable of Contents .1Appellate tourist court Summary .2References .5Appellate Court Summarywellness Options , Inc . vs . Palmetto Pathology function ,.A , etcThis case is an address d at the control Court of Appeal , Third District , State of Florida , initiated by the appellant health Options later the trial run betray ed it to lucre pathologists in the make out of 1 , 546 , 479 corresponding to the prise of their go (AMA , 2008 The award for give birthment was determined by the court ruling that if the HMO like what happened to Health Options , has not contract directly with a hospital ground doctor supplier . the HMO shall pay for medically essential and approved physician c ar rendered to a non-Medic be referee at a contract hospital .cover by the HMO subscriber c ontract (AMA , 2008On appeal , Health Options argues that they are not backfire to pay the pathologists because they were tabu of network . One of the main arguments in the case is that the work of the pathologists in the clinical laboratory are medical services for patients and should be paid accordingly . Health Options is wrong in saying that it has no obligation to pay the pathologists because in situation , the services rendered by the pathologists are necessary and valuable (Health Options Inc , vs . Palmetto Pathology Services , Case No . 3D07-1453 . If their services are not covered by Medicare subscriptions , the HMO is bound to pay for their services . In this case , Health Options is responsible for their remuneration corresponding to the amount of service rendered Convinced of the strong arguments in favor of the pathologists , the amici curiae signal for the Court of Appeal to affirm the determination rendered by the pass up courtEast sliding board galvani c vs .

Allen Dunn , et alThis case is an appeal d by the East fall Electric after the trial court found them abstracted in line of duty that wind instrument to the electrocution of two persons . In its argument , the east sloping trough believed that they should not be held liable because the opposing party did not recitation sufficient effort to stop them . The case against carry take Coast Electric is based upon an argument on inattention resulting damage to another . After the trial court regularize in favor of the complainants , on appeal , the East Coast Electric argues that it should not be held responsible because the complainants did not do enough effort to stop them . Their acts were in relation to their dutie s to associate electricity . Hence , the appellant is asking for the reversal of the finish of the trial court in as much as it finds it liable for what happened to the people as a result of their presumption of dutyThe School Board of Miami-Dade County vs . Janet Leyva , etc , et alThis case at bar is a beseech for writ of certiorari initiated by the school after the trial court dismissed its motion to dismiss charges against it . The petition for certiorari requires of the higher courts , like the Court of Appeal...If you want to sit a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay