Minor Literature - Deleuze and Guattari

Michel Foucault states that, one writes in order to pass some other than what one is. In annals studies, Leigh Gilmore takes Foucaults dictum and explains it as follows: story offers an opportunity for self- varyation. Moreover, by world less a makeup with a fixed subject field summarized at the end of a long life, record becomes a speculative project in how to become other. Here, the transformative effect of autobiography refers at one performative expectation of literature.\nJonathan Culler points at the performativity of literature by stating that first, literary utterance suffers into existence characters and their legal actions, and second, literary works bring into being ideas, concepts, which they deploy. Culler concludes that literature takes its present among the acts of language that transform the world, transport into being the things that they name. In this regard, Cullers ideas attention deficit hyperactivity disorder one further point to Foucau ldian sense of transformative effect of writing, in the way that, writing back end not only transform the self  but in like manner transform the world. In both strips, we can retain the performativity of literature.\nIn this regard, let us discuss J. L. Austins and Judith butlers use of performativity through Cullers interpretations. Culler states that Austin is interested in how the repetition of a prescript on a champion occasion makes something happen (you make a promise), while for Butler this is a special case of the massive and obligatory repetition that produces historical and kind realities (you become a woman). Culler defines Austins understanding of the performative as follows: Performative utterances do not imbibe but perform the action they designate.\nCuller quotes Butler, who says that queer derives its force barely through the repeated prayer by which a social bond among homophobic communities is form through time. This example indicates the p rejudicious aspect of pe...